> On May 5, 1:21 pm, "Geoff"
>> glw82664 wrote:
>>>> Despite his flaws, he is better than any other presently-available
>>>> back-up. The Bills front office can use this season to make plans
>>>> for another back-up next year. What they would get for him now is
>>>> not worth having a far inferior back-up----especially with Edwards
>>>> injury history.
>>
>>> That makes sense. However, I look at it from this perspective. The
>>> Buffalo organization and its fans have no confidence in Losman.
>>
>> One wonders what merits the confidence in Tredwards? Last year,
>> Losman averaged 1.35 pts/drive while Edwards averaged just 1.16.
>
> One big difference in the two.One was a rookie.The other one has been
> in NFL for 4 yrs.Edwards showed flashes that he can be really
> good.That's uselly all you get from rookie QB's.He needs to step up
> and be more consistent next.
I agree with the first part. I completely disagree with the second.
Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. for the most part, Edwards showed zip.
> I think if you cant get a pick for Losman cut him.Can you see Losman
> sitting in meetings daily really trying to help Edwards?Do we even
> want Losman giving advice?I don't think Losman would be good for
> Edwards at all.I would rather have a backup that has there heart in
> it.
If Losman is smart, he'll play the good soldier. His value goes up if he
does.
> After this year Losman is gone no matter what.Why not bring in a
> back up this year and could maybe your long term backup.
That's fine, but who? This chump Baker ain't the answer.

