Buffalo Bills Talk

night · by **night** on Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:43 am

Kountzeguy wrote in news:c5901f1a-ab6b-4f1e-ac44-
35c605867978@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

> On Jun 9, 6:26 pm, Bender wrote:
>> Kountzeguy wrote:
>> > A game we would have won with
>> > Flutie.
>>
>> You're right, Fluite would've easily made that tackle on the pitch back
>> throwback.
>>
>> Back to the facts (which you have not, and can not, despute): Fluite was
>> a below average NFL QB.
>>
>>
>
> No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have started it
> wouldn't
> have came down to that play.We would have the game wrapped up already.

And if I had played the Lotto last night, I would now be a multi-
millionaire.

If, if, if .....

No proof, just "if".

Night

night · by **night** on Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:50 am

Kountzeguy wrote in news:1b33c072-e7e8-4a7b-827f-
868c9d3c87e6@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com:

> On Jun 10, 6:46 pm, Bender wrote:
>> Kountzeguy wrote:
>> > No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have started it
>> > wouldn't have came down to that play.
>>
>> Sorry, didn't read anything after this sentence......
>> ....didn't really need to ;-)
>>
>>
>
> Do you think Rob Johnson was a better NFL QB then Doug Flutie?
>
> If you think Rob is better your nuts.If you think Flutie is
> better,then from what
> I have seen better players playing in games give you a better shot to
> win.
>
> Doug Flutie is better then Rob Johnson so he would have givin us a
> better
> chance to win.A game we barely lost.Figure it out.

Yea!

Just like he did in Miami the year before.
Wait... didn't Buffalo lose that game? IIRC, it was a close game, no?

* reality.

Night

Bender · by **Bender** on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:28 pm

In article ,
night wrote:

> > No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have started it
> > wouldn't
> > have came down to that play.We would have the game wrapped up already.
>
> And if I had played the Lotto last night, I would now be a multi-
> millionaire.

LOL! That's why I didn't read past this point. When you start getting
into the fantasy logic of a Flutie Flake there is no more need to waste
ones time.

Kountzeguy · by **Kountzeguy** on Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:49 pm

On Jun 11, 1:50 pm, night wrote:
> Kountzeguy wrote in news:1b33c072-e7e8-4a7b-827f-
> 868c9d3c8...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 10, 6:46 pm, Bender wrote:
> >> Kountzeguy wrote:
> >> > No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have started it
> >> > wouldn't have came down to that play.
>
> >> Sorry, didn't read anything after this sentence......
> >> ....didn't really need to ;-)
>
> >>
>
> > Do you think Rob Johnson was a better NFL QB then Doug Flutie?
>
> > If you think Rob is better your nuts.If you think Flutie is
> > better,then from what
> > I have seen better players playing in games give you a better shot to
> > win.
>
> > Doug Flutie is better then Rob Johnson so he would have givin us a
> > better
> > chance to win.A game we barely lost.Figure it out.
>
> Yea!
>
> Just like he did in Miami the year before.
> Wait... didn't Buffalo lose that game? IIRC, it was a close game, no?
>

Wait didn't Doug Flutie get us to playoffs both years?Didn't Rob
Johnson
get his shot at being the starter the next few years.Which turned out
to be
very very very very bad years.No where near the playoffs.

So Rob Johnson is maybe the worst QB in Bills history.Doug Flutie is a
above average QB.Just my thinking putting in a much better QB in that
playoff game gives us a better chance of winning.I maybe wrong.Having
much worse players might be better.Maybe if we could have replaced
Bruce Smith with Ryan Denny we could have won 4 SBs.

I will stick with thinking we would have won that game with Flutie.

> * reality.
>
> Night- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Kountzeguy · by **Kountzeguy** on Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:53 pm

On Jun 11, 6:28 pm, Bender wrote:
> In article ,
>
> night wrote:
> > > No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have started it
> > > wouldn't
> > > have came down to that play.We would have the game wrapped up already.
>
> > And if I had played the Lotto last night, I would now be a multi-
> > millionaire.
>
> LOL! That's why I didn't read past this point. When you start getting
> into the fantasy logic of a Flutie Flake there is no more need to waste
> ones time.

It's weird to me one thing.All the people that liked Rob Johnson liked
JP Losman.They didn't like Doug Flutie or Drew Bledsoe.Cleary based on
the guys you have liked you know nothing about QBs.

Bender · by **Bender** on Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:33 am

Kountzeguy wrote:

> It's weird to me one thing.All the people that liked Rob Johnson liked
> JP Losman.

Once again,a pure Flutie Flake fantasy fact.

> They didn't like Doug Flutie or Drew Bledsoe.

Don't know what you mean by "they" but I was a huge fan of Drew Bledsoe
for quite some time. The guy had some talent but the QB position and the
game changed just at the wrong time for him.

> Cleary based on the guys you have liked you know nothing about QBs.

As you have made quite clear, you love Doug Fluite and Doug Flutie only.
That makes you are a 100% unadulterated Flutie Flake.

Thanks for the memories, I almost forgot how fun it was to humiliate you
morons ;-)

<50 bucks says you are under 5 foot 9 inches tall>

Kountzeguy · by **Kountzeguy** on Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:11 pm

On Jun 17, 8:33 am, Bender wrote:
> Kountzeguy wrote:
> > It's weird to me one thing.All the people that liked Rob Johnson liked
> > JP Losman.
>
> Once again,a pure Flutie Flake fantasy fact.

You liked Rob Johnson and JP Losman.So that fact is true.

>
> > They didn't like Doug Flutie or Drew Bledsoe.
>
> Don't know what you mean by "they" but I was a huge fan of Drew Bledsoe
> for quite some time. The guy had some talent but the QB position and the
> game changed just at the wrong time for him.

Im not sure what you mean by the position and game changed?Pocket
passers are the past,present,and the future at the QB position.Mobile
QBs were supose to the the future of the position for like 20 years
now.
The problem with Bledsoe in Buffalo is the fact that he had no Oline
and
he was getting old.

>
> > Cleary based on the guys you have liked you know nothing about QBs.
>
> As you have made quite clear, you love Doug Fluite and Doug Flutie only.
> That makes you are a 100% unadulterated Flutie Flake.

He was just way better then Rob Johnson is my point.That being I think
we win the Titans game with him starting.If me pointing that out makes
me a flake so be it.Better then a Rob Johnson backer such as yourself.

>
> Thanks for the memories, I almost forgot how fun it was to humiliate you
> morons ;-)

You thought Rob Johnson was the next Steve young.So I am the moron for
suporting Doug Flutie.Nice thinking you have!

>
> <50 bucks says you are under 5 foot 9 inches tall>

I'm 6-3 son.You got pay pal send me the money.

Geoff · by **Geoff** on Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:00 am

Kountzeguy wrote:
> On Jun 10, 6:46 pm, Bender wrote:
>> Kountzeguy wrote:
>>> No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have started it
>>> wouldn't have came down to that play.
>>
>> Sorry, didn't read anything after this sentence......
>> ....didn't really need to ;-)
>>
>>
>
> Do you think Rob Johnson was a better NFL QB then Doug Flutie?

Sounds eerily similar to all the Tred fans who ask if he's better than JP.
Who cares? They all suck.

Colddays99 · by **Colddays99** on Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:08 pm

On Jun 19, 9:00 am, "Geoff" wrote:
> Kountzeguy wrote:
> > On Jun 10, 6:46 pm, Bender wrote:
> >> Kountzeguy wrote:
> >>> No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have started it
> >>> wouldn't have came down to that play.
>
> >> Sorry, didn't read anything after this sentence......
> >> ....didn't really need to ;-)
>
> >>
>
> > Do you think Rob Johnson was a better NFL QB then Doug Flutie?
>
> Sounds eerily similar to all the Tred fans who ask if he's better than JP.
> Who cares? They all suck.

No thats where your very wrong and seem not to understand.Doug Flutie
had
a decent NFL career.Rob Johnson did nothing at all.HUGE difference
between the two.If you cant see that your blind or hard headed.One
sucked the other one didn't!

As far as Losman and Ewards goes.JP has had his shot.He has proven he
sucks.Trent Edwards has not had a chance to prove himself one way or
the other.Yet.He will get his shot and we will see.

night · by **night** on Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:25 am

Kountzeguy wrote in
news:a6674b37-a9f2-468c-bf87-87c02f65d2ab@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com:

> On Jun 11, 1:50 pm, night wrote:
>> Kountzeguy wrote in
>> news:1b33c072-e7e8-4a7b-827f-
>> 868c9d3c8...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 10, 6:46 pm, Bender wrote:
>> >> Kountzeguy wrote:
>> >> > No he wouldn't have made that tackle.If Flutie would have
>> >> > started it wouldn't have came down to that play.
>>
>> >> Sorry, didn't read anything after this sentence......
>> >> ....didn't really need to ;-)
>>
>> >>
>>
>> > Do you think Rob Johnson was a better NFL QB then Doug Flutie?
>>
>> > If you think Rob is better your nuts.If you think Flutie is
>> > better,then from what
>> > I have seen better players playing in games give you a better shot
>> > to win.
>>
>> > Doug Flutie is better then Rob Johnson so he would have givin us a
>> > better
>> > chance to win.A game we barely lost.Figure it out.
>>
>> Yea!
>>
>> Just like he did in Miami the year before.
>> Wait... didn't Buffalo lose that game? IIRC, it was a close game, no?
>>
>
> Wait didn't Doug Flutie get us to playoffs both years?

And did he not lose the one he started in? In a close game in which we
lost?

Did not the "better" QB achieve the same result as the "sucky" QB?

> Didn't Rob
> Johnson
> get his shot at being the starter the next few years.Which turned out
> to be
> very very very very bad years.No where near the playoffs.
>
> So Rob Johnson is maybe the worst QB in Bills history.Doug Flutie is a
> above average QB.

For somebody that has stressed sacks and turnovers lead to losses, I
find it interesting you claim DF was an "above average" QB.
Do you realize DF TD/Turnover ratio was bad? Not "bad *", just bad.

> Just my thinking putting in a much better QB in that
> playoff game gives us a better chance of winning.

And if I buy $100 worth of Lotto tickets instead of a $1 worth, I
increase my chance of winning a hundred fold. Same result, however.

> I maybe wrong.Having
> much worse players might be better.Maybe if we could have replaced
> Bruce Smith with Ryan Denny we could have won 4 SBs.

Here's the problem. Nobody is disagreeing with you that RJ sucked.
The disagreement is over the perceived value of Flutie.
You are the only person in here that still thinks Flutie is "above
average". Most people in here have come to accept the reality Flutie was
nothing more than below-average to average.

And spare me the "he was better than RJ" as some kind of measuring
stick.

The only stature Flutie can be assured of by beating out "maybe the
worst QB in Bills history" is he is at least the second worst QB in
Bills history.

> I will stick with thinking we would have won that game with Flutie.

You stick with that thought, because that is all you have left.

Night

Buffalo Bills Talk

Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Re: Bills sign QB Matt Baker

Who is online